Refeds


Subject Re: InCommon comments on proposed REFEDS R&S definition
From Nicole Harris <harris@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date Tue, 28 Oct 2014 11:11:02 -0400

Apparently this didn't send. Sorry!

Sent from my iPhone

> On 27 Oct 2014, at 09:33, Ian Young <ian@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>> On 27 Oct 2014, at 12:57, Cantor, Scott <cantor.2@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, I think a tag would need to be more explicit about what "partial"
>> means. Maybe it means "EPPN only". But it has to be explicit to be useful.
>
> +1
>
> There's no point talking about and additional support category on the basis of anything other than a specific proposal; we'll just end up talking past each other again.

+1. If it's not R&S, it's something else. Happy to discuss what
something else means. Very much take Peter's point on not reusing the
name in any sense too.