Refeds


Subject Re: [schac] Re: SCHAC OIDs
From Peter Schober <peter.schober@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date Tue, 14 Oct 2014 13:14:30 +0200

Thanks for checking, Javier!

That confirms that the published SCHAC spec (the PDF) & LDAP schema
are and always were correct in this regard.
Meaning the so-called new registry (which cannot be authoritative for
the SCHAC base OID hierarchy anyway, IMO, only where the spec refers
to it) is wrong.
So this will be fixed once it's clear what happens with that "new"
registry (unless anyone wants to put a big fat warning on
https://urnreg.terena.org/ now, stating that information from it MUST
NOT be used for reference at this time.)

And no changes necessary for /anyone/ deploying or using or
documenting SCHAC according to the published spec or LDAP schema.
-peter

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature