Subject Re: revising SWAMID R&S
From Leif Johansson <leifj@xxxxxxxx>
Date Fri, 10 Oct 2014 17:54:18 +0200

On 2014-10-10 15:54, Steven Carmody wrote:
> On 10/9/14 2:51 PM, Leif Johansson wrote:
>> When SWAMID switched from our own R&E category to REFEDS R&S we did an
>> automatic conversion and clearly we've gotten at least one entity wrong
>> namely which falls in scope of SWAMID R&E but not REFEDS
>> R&S. We'll be fixing this case tomorrow and will check all our other
>> tagged entities at the same time.
> Leif and Hans,
> There's currently yet another discussion raging within the InCommon TAC
> about an SP newly proposed for R&S. A portion of that discussion (but
> only a portion) centers around whether the term "Scholarship" also
> includes "instruction". This is particularly a problem for the research
> universities here in the US because oftentimes work that starts as
> research quickly crosses the line and is being presented in the classroom.
> So, in the interests of feeding the conversation, and because the REFEDS
> R&S standard is still in flux, could you provide a bit more detail about
> your reasoning behind this decision ?
> Thanks very much !

In this case (for the MSDNAA SP) it was much simpler than that. We had
failed to notice that "sells stuff at a discount to students and staff"
is explicitly excluded from the category.

	Cheers Leif