Refeds


Subject Re: draft charge, refeds working group on attribute release
From Leif Johansson <leifj@xxxxxxxx>
Date Fri, 01 Jul 2011 22:52:36 +0200

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 07/01/2011 10:48 PM, Cantor, Scott E. wrote:
> On 7/1/11 4:41 PM, "John Bradley" <ve7jtb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> SAML inherits a bad rap from XML canonicalization.  Simple sign  was an
>> attempt to address that, but it was not picked up.
> 
> Which puts the lie to the library argument.

Not really - ever tried to get libxmlsec1 working with a set of python
and perl wrappers. I shudder.

> 
> They could also simply have encoded the SAML into JSON and maintained the
> semantics and a greater degree of code reuse.
> 
> But, none of this really matters because we could deploy all this tomorrow
> and we'd still be refusing to release the data.

Yes. We are working multiple threads here

	Cheers Leif
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk4OM5QACgkQ8Jx8FtbMZncUrgCdGCFJ3Acl4c6JViAgnYnULw1z
Bm0AnRhmcK030y70DtLsyfMl1Mob9u6b
=YKfY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----