Subject Re: draft charge, refeds working group on attribute release
From "Cantor, Scott E." <cantor.2@xxxxxxx>
Date Fri, 1 Jul 2011 20:48:32 +0000

On 7/1/11 4:41 PM, "John Bradley" <ve7jtb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>SAML inherits a bad rap from XML canonicalization.  Simple sign  was an
>attempt to address that, but it was not picked up.

Which puts the lie to the library argument.

They could also simply have encoded the SAML into JSON and maintained the
semantics and a greater degree of code reuse.

But, none of this really matters because we could deploy all this tomorrow
and we'd still be refusing to release the data.

-- Scott