Subject Re: draft charge, refeds working group on attribute release
From "Cantor, Scott E." <cantor.2@xxxxxxx>
Date Fri, 1 Jul 2011 17:15:51 +0000

On 7/1/11 1:13 PM, "Leif Johansson" <leifj@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> That's one reason. Another is the scalability (or lack there of) of the
>> trust management and key management mechanisms available. Usually there
>> are none, with a commensurate loss of security. And there's the question
>> of identifiers and other attributes, because dealing with more IdPs
>> accomodating variance.
>Yeah we need metadata for openidc ;-)

Which is easy. But it will never supported by any of the "simple" modules
that these apps want to use. We couldn't even get billion dollar companies
to support it for SAML.

-- Scott