Subject Re: SAML 2.0 conformance test for an open source offering
From Niels van Dijk <niels.vandijk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date Wed, 07 Jul 2010 23:18:31 +0200

Hi Keith,

Just for my informaton, what was the reason for allowing 'just' one
opensource product? And what would be the cost of getting the
predominant products used in highered into this testbed?


On 07/07/2010 06:09 PM, Keith Hazelton wrote:
> RL"Bob" graciously recommended that I sit in for him for now on the Kantara Interop. Review Board.  That group will be hosting a SAML 2.0 conformance testing event in September.  There is room for one open source product to participate at no cost.
> The IRB's man concern is for the equitability of the process for selecting which open source SAML package will be offered this opportunity.  As of the present time, I have not heard a statement of interest for having Shibboleth be a candidate.  I have contacted Anders Lund about simpleSAMLphp and Leif and Roland about PySAML2 and am waiting to hear back.  Are there other potential open source SAML 2.0 products that should be on the list?
>          --Keith

Niels van Dijk
Advanced Services

T: +31 302 305 337 / M: +31 651 347 657
SURFnet - PO Box 19035 - NL-3501 DA Utrecht - The Netherlands -
SURFnet - We make innovation work

fn:NIels  van Dijk
n:van Dijk;NIels 
org:SURFnet;Advanced Services
adr:;;;Utrecht;;;The Netherlands
tel;work:+31 320 305 337
tel;cell:+31 651 347 657