Refeds


Subject Re: edu ID branding
From Leif Johansson <leifj@xxxxxxxx>
Date Tue, 01 Jun 2010 10:35:36 +0200

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 06/01/2010 10:23 AM, Mark Williams (JISC) wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Clearly some constituencies have an issue with the EDU part of EDUID (or an edu specific part of any other solution we may look at). So how about an extendable brand?
> 
> for example (and i really just mean for example!)
> FID + common logon
> perhaps education sector would use eFID +common logo
> maybe government sector could use FID +common logo
> and in government only areas maybe GFID + common logo.
> 
> At the moment we seem to be coming at the branding issue with focus on the IdP community choosing what / which. Perhaps the choice should be left more up to the Service Provider - if a publisher determines that academic users are their primary constituency, they may chose to put EFID + common logo as priority placed login. If government is their target then maybe they use the login with out the bespoke education sector identification and avoid alienating users?
> 
> Just a thought

AFAIU the _only_ property of an eduid we can be sure of is that
the identity belongs to somebody related to the R&E community.

I understand people are uncomfortable with the implications that
eduid somehow limits federated identity to the educational sector
but the brand actually has to mean something and I don't know that
"federated identity" is well defined enough outside our sector to
be able to carry a single brand.

	Cheers Leif
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkwExlMACgkQ8Jx8FtbMZncHSACgxfJwukBh+3LLBx8nDekSsAVm
ZpIAoMM27FeHI+0smHUei66ZAod9PQ3Y
=U184
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----